Mental Health & Wellbeing: How to Support Employees with Anxiety or Depression

Executive Summary

The escalating prevalence of mental health challenges, particularly anxiety and depression, in the global workforce presents a critical and growing challenge for organizations. These conditions profoundly impact not only individual employee well-being but also organizational performance, manifesting as significant productivity losses, increased healthcare expenditures, and higher employee turnover rates. The financial burden associated with untreated mental health conditions is substantial, making a compelling economic argument for proactive intervention. Beyond the financial imperative, employers bear clear legal and ethical responsibilities to provide a safe and supportive work environment. This report outlines a strategic framework for organizations to effectively address and support employees experiencing anxiety or depression. The approach encompasses fostering a supportive and destigmatized culture, implementing practical support initiatives such as Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and flexible work arrangements, providing individualized accommodations, and equipping managers with essential skills. Emphasizing continuous measurement and evaluation is crucial to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of these strategies, ultimately cultivating a healthier, more engaged, and more productive workforce.

1. The Imperative of Workplace Mental Health: Understanding the Landscape

The modern workplace is increasingly recognizing the profound impact of mental health on its most valuable asset: its people. Understanding the landscape of mental health in the professional sphere is the first step toward building resilient and thriving organizations.

Defining Mental Health and its Workplace Relevance

Mental health is comprehensively defined as an individual’s capacity to realize their potential, effectively manage life’s stresses, learn, and work productively.¹ It forms a fundamental aspect of overall well-being, enabling individuals to build meaningful relationships and make informed personal and social decisions.¹ Work environments, while offering purpose, structure, and social connection, can paradoxically serve as a source of harm if not managed with employee well-being as a core consideration.² Mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, are characterized by clinically notable disturbances in cognition, emotional regulation, or behavior that can significantly impede an individual’s functioning.¹

Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression in the Workforce

The scope of mental health challenges within the workforce is significant. Globally, approximately 15% of working-age adults live with a mental disorder at any given time.² In the United States, a notable 19% of workers report their mental health as fair or poor.⁴ The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated these existing challenges, leading to a 25% increase in stress and anxiety-related disorders within the U.S..⁵ Overall, around 1 in 6 people (14.7%) experience mental health problems directly within the workplace context.⁶ Further underscoring the widespread nature of these issues, 84% of U.S. workers reported experiencing at least one mental health challenge in the past year, with 71% indicating symptoms of stress.⁶

Initial Observations: The Significant Impact of Mental Health Conditions on Employee Attendance (Absenteeism) and Productivity While Present (Presenteeism)

Mental health problems are a substantial determinant of employee attendance and overall productivity.⁴ Employees reporting fair or poor mental health experience approximately four times more unplanned absences due to their mental health challenges compared to their healthier counterparts.⁴

Absenteeism, defined as the time employees are absent from work for various reasons, including illness, injury, or mental health problems, can lead to significant operational disruptions, increased workloads for other team members, and potential financial losses for the company.⁴ It is recognized as a multifaceted issue with significant personal, social, and economic repercussions.¹

Presenteeism occurs when employees are physically present at work but are not fully engaged or productive due to factors such as illness, stress, or burnout.⁴ This phenomenon is often more subtle and challenging to detect than absenteeism, as individuals may appear to be working while their actual performance and output are compromised.⁴ Conditions like depression, anxiety, high stress levels, and burnout directly manifest as difficulties such as missed deadlines, an increase in errors, and an overall reduction in the quality and quantity of work.⁵ Research indicates that a personal or family history of mental health issues significantly increases both absenteeism and presenteeism.¹ Furthermore, personal stigma surrounding mental health is identified as a key factor contributing to absenteeism.¹ In the UK, poor mental health is the primary cause of sickness absences, with roughly 50% of long-term sick leave attributed to stress, depression, and anxiety.⁶ Across all sectors, 47% of employees exhibit presenteeism due to poor mental health.⁶

The observation that presenteeism is often more insidious and harder to detect, with its costs potentially exceeding those of absenteeism ¹, highlights a critical aspect of workplace mental health. While absenteeism provides a clear, tangible indicator of mental health issues, the pervasive nature of presenteeism represents a hidden drain on productivity and resources that organizations frequently underestimate. Nearly half of all employees displaying presenteeism ⁶ suggests that a narrow focus solely on absenteeism data can lead to a significant underestimation of the true impact of mental health challenges. Addressing this requires organizations to move beyond simply tracking sick days, developing tools and fostering cultural shifts that can identify and address reduced productivity while present. This demands a more nuanced, proactive approach, incorporating performance monitoring and regular well-being check-ins, alongside creating an environment where employees feel safe to acknowledge reduced capacity without fear of penalty.

The comprehensive definition of mental health, encompassing an individual’s ability to realize their potential, manage stress, learn, and work productively ¹, coupled with the direct links between mental health problems and impacts on employee attendance and productivity ⁴, underscores a fundamental truth. Mental health is not merely a personal wellness concern; it is inextricably linked to core work functions and, consequently, overall organizational output and efficiency. This reframes mental well-being from a “feeling good” state to a “performing well” capability. Therefore, supporting mental health is not simply a welfare initiative or a corporate social responsibility endeavor but a strategic investment in human capital and operational efficiency. It directly contributes to the core business objectives of productivity, quality, and innovation, elevating mental health support from a “nice-to-have” to a “must-have” for sustainable organizational success and competitive advantage.

The significant increase in stress and anxiety-related disorders during the pandemic ⁵, followed by 81% of workplaces increasing their focus on employee mental health ⁶, indicates that the pandemic acted as a catalyst. It did not create mental health issues but rather exacerbated existing, often latent, challenges and accelerated their recognition by employers. However, the fact that 1 in 3 employees still feel mental health support in their workplace is inadequate ⁶ reveals a substantial gap between employer intent and employee experience. While the heightened awareness and increased focus post-pandemic present a unique opportunity to embed mental health support more deeply and sustainably into organizational culture and operations, there is a clear need to move beyond superficial initiatives. This gap between employer effort and employee perception necessitates a re-evaluation of current strategies, emphasizing genuine impact, accessibility, and cultural integration rather than just program implementation. This means actively listening to employee feedback and adapting support structures to truly meet their needs.

2. The Business Case: Quantifying the Impact of Untreated Mental Health

Neglecting mental health in the workplace carries substantial financial repercussions, providing a compelling economic rationale for strategic investment in employee well-being. The costs extend far beyond individual suffering, directly impacting an organization’s bottom line.

Productivity Losses: Absenteeism and Presenteeism

The global economy suffers immense productivity losses, with an estimated 12 billion work days lost annually due to anxiety and depression alone.² This staggering figure equates to approximately 50 million years of work.⁶ In the United States, untreated mental health conditions are responsible for an estimated 200 million lost workdays each year.⁵ Specifically, absenteeism attributed to depression alone costs U.S. businesses approximately $44 billion annually.⁵ The broader economic burden of mental illnesses linked to absenteeism in the U.S. is projected to reach $7.4 billion in 2024.¹ Even more significant, presenteeism costs are anticipated to reach around $45.7 billion in 2024 in the U.S., a figure nearly six times greater than the economic burden of absenteeism.¹ Depression is identified as the single largest predictor of both absenteeism and overall work-related performance issues.⁷ A critical cost allocation reveals that for every 47 cents spent on treating depression, an additional 53 cents is indirectly spent on the consequential impacts of absenteeism, presenteeism, and disability.⁷

Financial Costs: Healthcare Expenditures, Employee Turnover, and Lost Productivity

The global economic toll of mental health issues is immense, costing approximately $1 trillion each year, primarily stemming from reduced productivity.² The U.S. alone incurs an estimated $1 trillion per year in lost productivity and revenue specifically due to anxiety and depression.⁵ Beyond direct productivity, job stress is estimated to cost American companies over $300 billion annually in combined health costs, absenteeism, and poor performance.⁷ Healthcare expenditures are nearly 50% greater for workers who report high levels of stress.⁷ Employees managing chronic conditions alongside co-occurring depression incur more than double the costs for employers compared to those with only chronic conditions.⁵ Untreated mental health concerns are cited as the primary driver for a projected 5.4% to 8.5% increase in 2024 health costs.⁵

High employee turnover rates represent a substantial cost of ignoring mental health. Replacing an employee can cost up to 50% or more of their annual salary ⁵, with some estimates reaching 120-200% of the affected position’s salary.⁷ A significant 40% of job turnover is directly attributed to stress.⁷ Data further reveals that 89% of employees with mental health issues report it impacting their working life, with over half having considered resigning due to negative impacts on their mental well-being.⁶ Notably, 68% of millennials and 81% of Gen Zs left their jobs for mental health-related reasons in the last year.⁶ Untreated mental health issues can also foster a negative workplace culture and strained employee relations, as stigma contributes to a toxic environment where employees are less likely to seek support, exacerbating their conditions.⁵

The Return on Investment (ROI) of Proactive Mental Health Support

Investing in mental health support is not merely a cost but a strategic business move. It can foster a healthy work environment, significantly reduce healthcare costs, and improve employee retention.⁵ Initiatives designed to improve workplace mental health can yield a substantial return on investment, up to 800%, through benefits such as higher productivity, fewer sick days, and lower staff turnover.⁶ A specific example highlights that an initial investment of £80 per employee in promoting well-being initiatives can result in a net return of approximately £600 in savings, primarily due to reduced presenteeism and absenteeism.⁶ Beyond direct cost savings, happy employees are demonstrably more productive, showing an average increase of 13%.⁶ Flexible work arrangements also contribute to higher productivity, as employees perform better when they have greater autonomy over their time.⁸

Table 1: The Cost of Poor Mental Health in the Workplace (Global & US Estimates)

Metric	Value (Global/US)	Source
Global annual cost (productivity loss)	$1 trillion	2
US annual cost (productivity & revenue)	$1 trillion	5
US annual cost (job stress, health, absenteeism, poor performance)	$300 billion	7
US annual cost (lost productivity due to mental health difficulties)	$80-$100 billion	5
US annual cost (absenteeism due to depression)	$44 billion	5
US projected economic burden of mental illnesses (absenteeism 2024)	$7.4 billion	1
US projected presenteeism costs (2024)	$45.7 billion	1
Annual lost workdays (US, untreated mental health)	200 million	5
Global lost workdays (depression & anxiety)	12 billion	2
Healthcare expenditures for stressed workers	Nearly 50% greater	7
Job turnover due to stress	40%	7
Cost to replace an employee	50%+ of salary / 120-200% of salary	5

The data presented in Table 1 and the surrounding analysis reveals a critical dynamic: mental health issues do not simply add discrete costs but instead exacerbate existing physical health problems and indirectly amplify other operational costs. For example, employees with chronic conditions and co-occurring depression cost employers more than double compared to those with only chronic conditions.⁵ Furthermore, for every 47 cents spent on treating depression, an additional 53 cents is indirectly spent on the consequential impacts of absenteeism, presenteeism, and disability.⁷ This demonstrates a powerful multiplier effect, where the true cost of poor mental health is far greater than the direct mental health treatment costs alone. This understanding suggests that investing in mental health is not just about addressing mental health conditions in isolation; it is a powerful preventative measure that can significantly reduce overall healthcare expenditures and mitigate the financial drain from other health-related absences and performance issues. A holistic health strategy, integrating mental and physical well-being, is therefore not only ethically sound but also demonstrably more cost-effective in the long run.

A significant trend that further compels attention to workplace mental health is observed in generational shifts. The statistic that 68% of millennials and 81% of Gen Zs left their jobs for mental health-related reasons in the last year ⁶ stands out, particularly when contrasted with the general 40% turnover attributed to stress.⁷ This generational data point suggests a fundamental shift in what younger workers prioritize in their employment and their willingness to leave if mental health support is perceived as inadequate or absent. Their values are directly impacting talent mobility, indicating that for talent acquisition and retention, particularly among younger demographics who represent the future workforce, mental health support is no longer a mere perk but a critical, non-negotiable factor in employment decisions. Companies that fail to proactively address mental well-being risk losing significant portions of their valuable human capital, leading to substantial and recurring recruitment, training, and onboarding costs. This creates a clear competitive advantage for organizations that genuinely prioritize and invest in comprehensive mental health strategies.

The compelling return on investment figures, with initiatives yielding up to 800% ⁶ and a specific example of a £80 investment resulting in £600 in savings ⁶, stand in stark contrast to the massive costs of untreated mental health—trillions globally and billions in the US.² This juxtaposition clearly demonstrates that proactive investment in mental health initiatives is not merely a “good deed” or a compliance exercise but a financially astute business decision that yields significant returns by preventing much larger, downstream costs. It represents a shift from a reactive “cost of illness” model to a proactive “return on health” model. Organizations should therefore fundamentally shift their mindset from viewing mental health support as a discretionary expense to viewing it as a strategic investment that directly contributes to profitability, productivity, and long-term organizational sustainability. The overwhelming financial data supports a strong “business case” for moving beyond basic compliance to comprehensive, proactive well-being strategies as a core component of overall business strategy.

3. Legal and Ethical Frameworks: Employer Responsibilities and Employee Rights

Navigating the complexities of mental health in the workplace requires a clear understanding of both legal obligations and ethical considerations. These frameworks guide employers in creating environments that are not only compliant but also genuinely supportive.

Employer’s Duty of Care: Ensuring Physical and Psychological Safety

Employers bear a legal obligation to proactively manage risks and ensure the health and safety of their workers, encompassing both physical and mental well-being.⁹ This is a fundamental requirement under work health and safety laws.⁹ This duty mandates the prevention of harm by identifying and effectively managing any factors within the workplace that could negatively impact mental health.⁹ The scope of a safe and healthy work environment extends beyond physical hazards to include ensuring the workplace is free from sexual and psychological harassment. Employers are required to implement robust harassment prevention and complaint processing policies.¹¹ Furthermore, employers must take decisive action to prevent or stop any form of physical or psychological violence at work, including spousal, family, or sexual violence, an obligation that notably extends to remote workers operating from their home locations.¹¹

Key Legislation and Protections

Across various jurisdictions, specific legislation outlines the rights of employees and the responsibilities of employers regarding mental health.

• United States:

• FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act): Eligible employees are entitled to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for their own serious health condition, which explicitly includes mental health conditions, or to care for a spouse, child, or parent with a serious mental health condition.¹² A “serious health condition” is defined as requiring either inpatient care or continuing treatment by a healthcare provider.¹²
• ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act): The ADA is foundational for the broader duty of reasonable accommodation.¹⁰ The Job Accommodation Network (JAN) is highlighted as a valuable resource for ADA compliance and accommodation guidance.¹⁵
• United Kingdom:
• Equality Act 2010: This legislation provides comprehensive protection for disabled individuals, including many people with mental illness, from unfair treatment, discrimination, harassment, and victimisation.¹⁶ Employers are legally mandated to make “reasonable adjustments” to accommodate disabilities.¹⁶ These protections apply across various aspects of employment, including job applications, terms and conditions, promotions, and dismissal.¹⁶
• Canada:
• Human Rights Acts (e.g., Alberta Human Rights Act): These acts prohibit discrimination against employees based on their mental health conditions, explicitly including stress or anxiety.¹⁷ Employers are legally obligated to provide accommodations to the point of “undue hardship”.¹⁴ Such accommodations may involve adjusting workloads, offering flexible hours, or providing additional support as needed.¹⁷ A significant aspect of Canadian law is the employer’s “duty to inquire”: if an employer “reasonably ought to be aware” that a disability is contributing to poor performance, they have a duty to investigate the relationship between the possible disability and performance issues.¹⁷
• Australia:
• Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) (DDA): This act makes it unlawful to discriminate against, harass, or victimise people with disabilities (a term broadly defined to include mental illness) in employment.¹⁸ A failure by an employer to make reasonable adjustments for a worker with a mental illness may constitute direct or indirect discrimination.¹⁸ Employers must provide equal employment opportunities if an individual can fulfill the ‘inherent requirements’ of the job.¹⁹ Australian work health and safety legislation also imposes obligations on employers to ensure health and safety, including mental health, and to proactively eliminate or manage risks.¹⁸

The Concept of “Reasonable Accommodations” and “Undue Hardship”

Employers are legally required to make reasonable adjustments (accommodations) to support ‘recovery at work’ and to implement effective return-to-work programs.⁹ This is not just a legal mandate but also leads to demonstrably better outcomes for both the employee and the business.⁹ The purpose of accommodations is to promote integration and full participation, ensuring that an employee who is otherwise able to work can do so effectively.¹⁴ An adjustment may generally be considered “unreasonable” if it is excessively expensive or if it significantly disturbs or prevents other employees from performing their work.⁹ However, most workplace adjustments are simple and low-cost.⁹ The duty to accommodate is underpinned by three core principles: respect for dignity, individualization, and integration.¹⁴ Accommodation must be provided in a manner that most respects the individual’s dignity.¹⁴

Employees, in turn, have responsibilities: they are required to make their accommodation needs known (preferably in writing), provide relevant information about restrictions (including from healthcare professionals when necessary), actively participate in discussions about solutions, and cooperate with any experts involved in the accommodation process.¹⁴ Once accommodations are provided, employees are expected to meet agreed-upon performance standards.¹⁴ Employers are permitted to ask about a worker’s mental health condition only if there is a legitimate reason, such as determining if the person can perform essential job duties or if reasonable adjustments are required.⁹ Crucially, workers are not legally obligated to disclose their mental health condition if it does not affect their ability to perform their job.⁹ Confidentiality of such information is paramount.⁹

Ethical Considerations: Confidentiality, Autonomy, Beneficence, and Justice

Employers have a fundamental ethical and legal duty to provide a safe and healthy work environment, which inherently includes supporting employees’ mental health. This obligation must be carefully balanced with the need to maintain a productive and efficient workplace.¹⁰

• Confidentiality: This is a critical concern in providing mental health support. Employers must ensure that employees’ personal and medical information is kept confidential, while simultaneously ensuring employees receive the necessary support.¹⁰
• Autonomy: Respecting employees’ autonomy and their capacity for self-determination and decision-making is a core ethical principle.¹⁰ Mental health support tools should be designed to offer employees full autonomy of usage, without requiring permission or additional accommodations.²¹
• Beneficence: Employers are ethically bound to act in the best interests of their employees, providing support and resources that actively promote their well-being.¹⁰
• Justice: Employers must operate in a fair and equitable manner, ensuring that all employees have accessible and equal opportunities to the support and resources they need.¹⁰ This principle extends to ensuring balanced access to flexible work schedules and other benefits.²¹

Other significant ethical considerations include maintaining strong, consistent, and continuously improving support structures.²¹ Ethical duties also encompass promoting balanced work schedules and mitigating cultural pressure for excessive overtime, which can lead to burnout and heightened anxiety.²¹

Table 2: Key Legal Obligations and Protections by Region (US, UK, Canada, Australia)

Country/Region	Primary Legislation/Act	Key Employer Obligations	Key Employee Rights/Protections	Specific Mental Health Provisions/Examples
US	FMLA, ADA	Provide safe/healthy workplace; Prevent discrimination; Reasonable accommodation; Confidentiality	Job-protected leave; Protection from discrimination; Right to reasonable accommodation; Privacy of health information; Safe & healthy workplace	Serious health condition under FMLA; Mental illness as disability; Flexible work; Time off for treatment
UK	Equality Act 2010	Prevent discrimination, harassment, victimisation; Make reasonable adjustments; Confidentiality	Protection from discrimination, harassment, victimisation; Right to reasonable adjustments; Privacy of health information; Safe & healthy workplace	Mental illness as disability; Flexible working; Time off for treatment; Changing role; Counselling/mentoring
Canada	Human Rights Acts, Occupational Health and Safety Act	Prohibit discrimination; Provide accommodations (to undue hardship); Duty to inquire (if disability impacts performance); Harassment prevention; Confidentiality	Protection from discrimination; Right to reasonable accommodation; Privacy of health information; Safe & healthy workplace	Mental health conditions (incl. stress/anxiety) protected; Adjusting workloads; Flexible hours; EAPs; Counseling services
Australia	Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA), Fair Work Act 2009, Work Health and Safety Legislation	Prohibit discrimination, harassment, victimisation; Make reasonable adjustments; Ensure health & safety; Manage risks; Confidentiality	Protection from discrimination, harassment, victimisation; Right to reasonable adjustments; Privacy of health information; Safe & healthy workplace	Mental illness as disability; Adjustments to work methods/hours; Workplace modifications; Recovery at work programs

The consistent mention of “undue hardship” across various legal frameworks ⁹ indicates that while the duty to accommodate is a strong and legally mandated principle, it is not absolute. There is a legal and ethical boundary where the burden on the employer becomes disproportionate or fundamentally alters the nature of the business or job. An adjustment may be considered “unreasonable” if it is excessively expensive or significantly impedes other employees’ work.⁹ This necessitates that employers engage in a good-faith, interactive process with employees to find accommodations that are both effective for the employee’s mental health condition and reasonable for the business operations. This requires careful documentation of the interactive process, creative problem-solving to explore various solutions, and a clear, objective understanding of what genuinely constitutes “undue hardship” in their specific organizational context, rather than a blanket refusal based on perceived inconvenience. This approach emphasizes collaboration and adaptability over rigid adherence to norms.

The evolving scope of employer responsibility, moving from a primary focus on physical safety to a comprehensive duty encompassing psychological well-being, is evident across the legal landscape. Employers are now explicitly mandated to provide a workplace that is both physically and mentally healthy.⁹ This expanded duty includes tackling issues like harassment and family violence, even extending protection to remote workers in their home locations.¹¹ The progressive trend in Canadian law, for instance, highlights increasing awareness of mental health issues and greater obligations on employers.¹⁷ This indicates a clear and broadening societal expectation: the traditional concept of “workplace safety” is evolving to encompass psychological safety and mental well-being as core employer responsibilities, reflecting a deeper understanding of the factors impacting employee health. Consequently, employers can no longer solely focus on mitigating physical hazards; they must proactively identify and mitigate psychological risks within the work environment, including excessive workload, lack of autonomy, poor management practices, and all forms of harassment. This requires a profound cultural shift and the integration of mental health considerations into all aspects of HR policy, leadership training, and operational management, moving towards a truly holistic duty of care.

The strong emphasis on confidentiality ¹⁰ and employee autonomy ¹⁰ in the context of mental health support is crucial for fostering trust and encouraging disclosure. While employers may legitimately ask about a condition to determine the need for accommodations ⁹, employees are not obligated to disclose if it doesn’t affect their job performance.⁹ This inherent tension highlights that employers need some information to provide effective support, but employees need absolute assurance of privacy and control over their personal data to feel safe enough to disclose their struggles without fear of judgment, stigma, or career repercussions. Trust is the bedrock upon which effective workplace mental health support is built. Therefore, employers must establish and rigorously uphold clear, transparent policies on data privacy and confidentiality, communicate them effectively to all employees, and crucially, train managers to respect these boundaries and avoid overstepping their role. This delicate balance is crucial for encouraging employees to seek help, fostering an environment where support is not only available but also genuinely trusted and utilized. Tools like the “READY? Tool” ⁹ exemplify empowering employee autonomy in disclosure decisions, which is key to building this trust.

4. Strategic Pillars for a Mentally Healthy Workplace

Building a truly supportive and mentally healthy workplace requires a multi-faceted approach, integrating cultural shifts, practical resources, and individualized support.

4.1. Fostering a Supportive Culture

A foundational element of any effective mental health strategy is the cultivation of a workplace culture that prioritizes well-being and reduces stigma.

Promoting Open Communication and Reducing Stigma

Cultivating a culture of open communication is paramount, enabling employees to feel genuinely comfortable discussing their mental health concerns without fear of judgment.²² Managers should conduct regular check-ins with employees to discuss workload, stress levels, and any challenges they may be facing, creating consistent opportunities for dialogue.²² Organizational leaders play a crucial role in establishing mental health-friendly environments by actively normalizing conversations about mental health and well-being.²⁴ The fact that only 13% of employees feel comfortable discussing their mental health in the workplace ⁶ underscores the urgent need for targeted efforts to reduce stigma and build psychological safety.

Leadership Commitment and Modeling Healthy Behaviors

The effectiveness and sustainability of mental health initiatives are directly contingent upon visible leadership involvement and unwavering commitment.²² Leaders should actively model healthy behaviors, such as taking regular breaks, utilizing their vacation days, and prioritizing work-life balance, thereby setting a positive example for the entire workforce.²² Organizations must regularly communicate their steadfast commitment to mental health, reinforcing its importance as a core value.²² Managers, in particular, can significantly influence team norms by visibly modeling and intentionally encouraging actions like taking breaks, actively checking in on stress and burnout, or even having therapy appointments visible on their work calendars, signaling that mental health is a normal and accepted part of work.²³

Establishing Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) and Peer Support Networks

Creating peer support networks within the organization is an effective way to foster a strong sense of community and camaraderie among staff.²⁵ These networks can take various forms, ranging from informal meetups where staff share experiences to more structured programs where employees are paired with mentors or colleagues for guidance and emotional support.²⁵ Peer assistance programs (PAPs), often sponsored by employers or unions, involve training peers to support troubled employees with substance misuse and other problems within defined boundaries.²⁰ Valuable external resources, such as the MindShare Toolkit for creating mental health ERGs and Mental Health America’s Center for Peer Support, are available to guide organizations in establishing these crucial networks.¹⁵

4.2. Implementing Practical Support Initiatives

Beyond cultural shifts, concrete programs and policies provide tangible support for employees.

Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs): Scope, Benefits, and Confidentiality

EAPs are voluntary, work-based programs offering free and confidential assessments, short-term counseling, referrals, and follow-up services to employees facing personal and/or work-related problems.²⁰ Their scope is broad, addressing issues such as alcohol and substance abuse, stress, grief, family problems, psychological disorders, marital/financial struggles, and workplace conflicts.²⁰ Beyond core counseling, EAPs often provide additional valuable services like legal assistance, adoption support, elder care resources, and general wellness programs.²⁰ For employers, EAPs offer tangible benefits, including reduced absenteeism, lower workers’ compensation claims, decreased healthcare costs, fewer accidents and grievances, improved employee productivity and engagement, and reduced costs associated with employee turnover.²⁰ EAP services are frequently extended to employees’ immediate family members or anyone residing in their homes.²⁰ A critical component of any EAP is strict confidentiality; EAPs are legally mandated not to release any information without the employee’s signed consent.²⁰ Under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008, EAPs cannot be used as a “gatekeeper” – requiring employees to use the EAP before accessing mental health or substance use benefits – unless a similar requirement exists for medical and surgical benefits.²⁰

Flexible Work Arrangements: Impact on Well-being and Productivity

Flexible schedules, encompassing remote work, flexible hours, and adjusted breaks, empower employees with greater control over their time and work environment, leading to significant improvements in mental, emotional, and physical health.⁸ Research indicates that 87% of employees offered flexibility choose to utilize it, with many reporting substantial enhancements in their mental health and job satisfaction.⁸ The benefits are multifaceted: reduced stress (e.g., by avoiding daily commutes), improved work-life balance (allowing time for personal priorities), direct improvements in mental health (lower anxiety and depression levels), and boosted physical health (more opportunities for exercise, healthy meal preparation, and better sleep).⁸ Flexible work models can increase job satisfaction by 60-67% and significantly reduce the likelihood of burnout.²⁸ They also contribute to higher productivity by minimizing workplace distractions and interruptions, allowing for a more focused and comfortable work environment.⁸

Mental Health Training: Equipping Managers and Mental Health First Aid (MHFA)

Providing training and development opportunities not only empowers employees but also significantly boosts their confidence and overall well-being.²² A critical gap exists: only 38% of HR respondents believe their line managers are adequately equipped to have sensitive conversations about mental health ⁶, with 70% of managers citing “structural barriers” to providing support.⁶ This highlights an urgent need for targeted training. Managers are not expected to be therapists; rather, their primary role is to be aware, supportive, and curious, proactively cultivating a work environment that positively impacts team members’ mental health and well-being.²³

Mental Health First Aid (MHFA): This specialized training equips individuals to recognize and respond to the signs of mental health or substance use challenges.²⁴ It is explicitly not a diagnostic tool but focuses on helping individuals identify distress, offer immediate support, and connect those in need with appropriate professional resources before a crisis escalates.²⁴ MHFA training has been shown to improve mental health literacy, increase confidence and the likelihood of taking action, reduce stigma, and foster greater empathy towards those experiencing mental health challenges.³² Organizational leaders who provide opportunities for MHFA training encourage participation and normalize conversations about mental health, thereby contributing significantly to stigma reduction and promoting early intervention.²⁴

Wellness Programs and Stress Reduction Techniques

Implementing comprehensive wellness programs is a key strategy. These programs can include mindfulness and meditation workshops, physical activity initiatives, and various self-care opportunities.²⁵ Mindfulness practices, such as guided meditation and deep-breathing exercises, are effective tools for employees to manage stress and enhance their mental well-being.²² Organizations can offer workshops, classes, or provide resources like apps and guided meditation sessions.²² Fitness programs are recognized for their ability to improve employees’ physical health, which in turn directly promotes positive mental health outcomes.³³

Work-Life Balance Initiatives

Actively encouraging employees to take regular breaks, fully utilize their vacation days, and genuinely disconnect from work outside of office hours is crucial.²² Organizations have an ethical duty to mitigate excessive overtime or cultural pressure that encourages employees to work beyond their scheduled hours, as this significantly contributes to burnout and ongoing anxiety.²¹ Establishing clear policies that encourage staff to fully disconnect during their time off is vital for mental restoration.²⁵ Insufficient rest, often resulting from long work hours or holding multiple jobs, poses significant risks to employees’ physical, emotional, and mental health, increasing the likelihood of workplace injuries, mistakes, exhaustion, anxiety, and depression.²⁶ A workplace culture that explicitly respects and encourages time off is a highly desired mental health support among employees.²⁸

4.3. Individualized Support: Reasonable Accommodations in Practice

Beyond broad programs, tailored support through reasonable accommodations is often necessary to enable employees with mental health conditions to thrive.

Examples of Effective Accommodations for Mental Health Conditions

• Flexible Schedule: Adjustments to work hours (e.g., modified start/end times, part-time work), job sharing, compensatory time, or “make-up” of missed time. This also includes flexible breaks or scheduling specific shifts (e.g., day vs. night) to align with an employee’s mental alertness or reduce anxiety related to commuting.¹⁶
• Communication Preferences: Adapting communication styles, such as providing instructions in writing (email or paper) rather than verbally, or allowing employees to record meetings for later review at their own pace.²⁹
• Private Workspace: Offering a quiet, less distracting workspace, a private office, or granting permission to use noise-canceling headphones to improve concentration and reduce sensory overload.²⁹
• Job Coach: Providing a dedicated job coach who can assist the employee in learning job responsibilities, exploring additional helpful accommodations, reducing anxiety, closely monitoring progress, and even joining meetings to ensure comprehension and task completion.²⁹
• Time off for Treatment: Allowing employees necessary time off work for medical appointments, therapy sessions, or other treatments directly related to their mental health condition.¹⁶
• Changing Role/Responsibilities: Temporarily or permanently reassigning an employee to a different role within the organization or adjusting specific daily tasks to better align with their current capacity and needs.⁹
• Aids/Equipment: Providing specific aids, tools, or equipment that can support the employee in performing their job duties more effectively despite their mental health condition.¹⁶

Navigating Confidentiality in Accommodation Requests

Employers are permitted to ask questions about a worker’s mental health condition if there is a legitimate reason, such as determining if reasonable adjustments are needed or if the person can perform the essential duties of their job.⁹ However, workers are not legally required to disclose their mental health condition to their employer if it does not affect their ability to perform their job.⁹ If an employee chooses to disclose their mental illness, employers are legally prohibited from disclosing this information to anyone else without the employee’s explicit consent, under privacy legislation.⁹ Information from EAPs, for instance, is typically only made available to the employer if the employee provides specific written permission.²⁰ In cases of mandatory EAP referrals, these should generally occur with the employee’s consent, and any limited feedback shared with the employer (e.g., on attendance or compliance) must also be with the employee’s signed consent.²⁰

Table 3: Examples of Reasonable Accommodations for Mental Health Conditions

Accommodation Type	Specific Examples	Benefit to Employee
Flexible Scheduling	Flexible hours, telecommuting/remote work, adjusted breaks, part-time work, job sharing, modified start/end times	Reduces stress/anxiety, improves work-life balance, enhances autonomy, supports recovery
Communication Adjustments	Written instructions (email/paper), allowing meeting recordings for later review	Aids comprehension, reduces pressure, improves focus
Workspace Modifications	Quiet workspace, private office, noise-canceling headphones	Improves concentration, reduces sensory overload, creates calm environment
Support Personnel	Job coach for task learning, exploring accommodations, anxiety reduction	Enhances confidence, provides immediate assistance, supports skill development
Leave/Time Off	Time off for medical appointments, therapy sessions, mental health days	Supports treatment and recovery, prevents burnout, allows for self-care
Role Adjustments	Temporary/permanent reassignment of tasks, adjustment of daily responsibilities	Reduces workload pressure, aligns with current capacity, supports gradual return to full duties
Aids/Equipment	Specific tools or equipment to support job performance	Overcomes functional limitations, enhances productivity

The significant disconnect revealed by the fact that only 38% of HR respondents believe their line managers are equipped to have sensitive conversations about mental health ⁶, coupled with 70% of managers citing “structural barriers” ⁶, highlights a profound challenge. Managers are not expected to be therapists; their role is to be aware, supportive, and curious, proactively creating a healthy environment.²³ This indicates that even with robust mental health policies and resources, their effective reach to employees is contingent upon adequately trained managers. Managers are the frontline implementers of mental health strategy, directly influencing daily employee experience. Therefore, investment in comprehensive manager training, including Mental Health First Aid ²⁴, is not an optional add-on but a foundational requirement for successful mental health initiatives. This training should focus on practical skills such as active listening, empathetic communication, awareness of available resources, modeling healthy behaviors, and understanding the boundaries of their role (i.e., not diagnosing or treating). It is about equipping managers to be effective “mental health allies” and facilitators of support, rather than expecting them to be mental health professionals.

Flexible work arrangements, as extensively detailed, offer benefits such as reduced stress, improved work-life balance, lower levels of anxiety and depression, boosted physical health, increased job satisfaction, and a reduction in burnout.⁸ This goes far beyond mere convenience or an attractive recruitment perk; it directly addresses many of the root causes and exacerbating factors of mental health distress in the workplace. The compelling data that 87% of employees offered flexibility utilize it and report improved mental health ⁸ underscores its direct and profound impact on well-being. Flexible work arrangements should therefore be strategically integrated as a core component of a comprehensive mental health strategy, rather than being viewed solely as a benefit for convenience or talent attraction. It serves as a powerful, scalable tool for both mental health prevention and ongoing support, empowering employees to self-manage their well-being, integrate work with personal needs, and ultimately contribute to a more resilient, engaged, and productive workforce. This redefines flexibility as a strategic imperative for organizational health.

The interconnectedness of physical and mental well-being is a crucial consideration. Mental health struggles can lead to difficulties with physical health or exacerbate chronic medical issues ⁵, while fitness programs designed to improve physical health, in turn, promote positive mental health.³³ Flexible hours also enable individuals to prioritize physical activity and nutrition, leading to improved physical and mental health.⁸ This demonstrates a clear, bidirectional, and synergistic relationship between physical and mental health. Workplace well-being programs must therefore adopt a truly holistic approach, integrating physical health initiatives seamlessly with mental health support. Addressing one dimension without considering the other will yield suboptimal results. Encouraging regular exercise, healthy eating habits, and adequate rest ²⁶ can serve as powerful preventative measures for mental health, and vice-versa. This necessitates a shift towards integrated wellness platforms, comprehensive communication strategies, and a culture that recognizes and supports the whole person.

5. Measuring Success and Driving Continuous Improvement

To ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of mental health initiatives, organizations must commit to rigorous evaluation. This involves establishing clear metrics, gathering consistent feedback, and demonstrating the return on investment.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Mental Health Initiatives

Establishing clear KPIs is the first step in measuring the success of wellness programs.³⁴ Common KPIs for mental health initiatives include:

• Employee Participation Rates: Tracking the uptake and engagement levels of various wellness offerings, such as Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs), designated mental health days, or on-demand therapy services.³⁴
• Absenteeism and Presenteeism Trends: Monitoring changes in the frequency and duration of time off taken for mental health-related issues, and assessing the prevalence of employees working while unwell but unproductive.³⁴
• Short-term and Long-term Disability Claims: Evaluating the incidence and duration of mental health-related disability claims. A measurable reduction in these claims can indicate more effective early intervention and support.³⁴
• Utilization of Mental Health Resources: Reviewing the usage patterns of specific mental health services, such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) sessions, coaching, or participation in wellness workshops.³⁴
• Employee Satisfaction and Engagement: Measuring overall employee happiness, job satisfaction, and willingness to recommend the company as an employer (e.g., through Employee Net Promoter Scores – eNPS).³⁵
• Turnover Rates: Monitoring changes in employee departure rates, particularly tracking those instances where mental health reasons are cited as a contributing factor.⁵
• Healthcare Costs: Tracking changes in mental health-related healthcare expenditures and overall health plan costs, looking for reductions attributable to proactive mental health support.⁵

Gathering Employee Feedback and Satisfaction (e.g., eNPS, surveys)

Regular, well-designed surveys are crucial for gaining insights into how employees perceive the mental health support provided and whether they feel comfortable and safe seeking help.³⁴ Employee Net Promoter Scores (eNPS) serve as a valuable metric to gauge employees’ willingness to be brand ambassadors for the company, categorizing them into promoters, passives, and detractors.³⁵ It is vital to combine eNPS with additional, more detailed surveys throughout the year, asking specific questions about overall work satisfaction, whether employees feel valued for their contributions, and their perception of the adequacy of the company’s wellness initiatives.³⁵ To ensure honest and candid responses, feedback mechanisms, including surveys, must be anonymous.³⁵ Following data collection, team meetings can be held to openly discuss eNPS results and brainstorm solutions in a constructive, solution-oriented manner.³⁵ Implementing anonymous feedback systems is also beneficial for gathering concerns about workplace stress or burnout, allowing employees to voice issues without fear of repercussion.²⁵

Calculating and Demonstrating Return on Investment (ROI)

While calculating the precise ROI of mental health programs can be challenging, it is an exceptionally valuable exercise for justifying investment.³⁴ ROI is typically measured through quantifiable cost savings achieved from reduced absenteeism, decreased presenteeism, fewer disability claims, and lower employee turnover.⁶ Leveraging data-driven insights is essential for identifying which programs are most effective, pinpointing existing gaps in support, and guiding resource allocation.³⁴

Conclusion and Recommendations

The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that supporting employee mental health, particularly in the context of anxiety and depression, is no longer merely a compassionate gesture but a strategic imperative for organizational success. The pervasive impact of untreated mental health conditions, from significant productivity losses due to absenteeism and the more insidious presenteeism, to escalating healthcare costs and high employee turnover, presents a compelling business case for proactive investment. The substantial return on investment observed in effective mental health initiatives underscores that these are not expenses but strategic investments yielding tangible financial benefits.

Furthermore, a robust legal and ethical framework mandates employers to provide a safe and healthy environment, encompassing psychological well-being and requiring reasonable accommodations for mental health conditions. Navigating these obligations demands a nuanced understanding of confidentiality, employee autonomy, and the dynamic nature of “undue hardship.”

To effectively support employees with anxiety or depression and cultivate a truly mentally healthy workplace, organizations are recommended to adopt a multi-pronged approach:

1. Cultivate a Culture of Psychological Safety: Actively promote open communication around mental health, working diligently to reduce stigma. This requires visible leadership commitment, where leaders model healthy behaviors and champion mental well-being as a core organizational value. Establishing Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) and peer support networks can further foster community and provide vital informal support channels.
2. Implement Comprehensive Support Initiatives:

• Leverage Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs): Ensure EAPs are well-communicated, easily accessible, and strictly confidential, offering a broad range of support services for employees and their families.
• Embrace Flexible Work Arrangements: Recognize flexible work as a powerful tool for stress reduction, improved work-life balance, and enhanced mental well-being. Integrate flexible schedules, remote work options, and respectful time-off policies as core components of the mental health strategy.
• Invest in Manager Training: Prioritize comprehensive training for managers, equipping them with the skills to recognize signs of distress, engage in empathetic conversations, and effectively refer employees to appropriate resources. Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training is a valuable component of this.
• Promote Holistic Wellness: Develop and promote wellness programs that integrate both physical and mental health components, offering resources such as mindfulness workshops, stress reduction techniques, and physical activity initiatives.

3. Provide Individualized Reasonable Accommodations: Establish clear processes for assessing and implementing reasonable accommodations for employees with mental health conditions. Examples include flexible scheduling, modified communication methods, private workspaces, and access to job coaches. Uphold strict confidentiality throughout this process, ensuring employees feel safe to disclose their needs without fear of repercussion.
4. Commit to Continuous Measurement and Improvement: Regularly evaluate the effectiveness of mental health initiatives using a range of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), including participation rates, absenteeism/presenteeism trends, disability claims, resource utilization, employee satisfaction (e.g., eNPS), turnover rates, and healthcare costs. Systematically gather employee feedback through anonymous surveys to understand perceptions and identify areas for improvement. Use this data to calculate and demonstrate the Return on Investment (ROI), reinforcing the strategic value of mental health support and guiding ongoing program enhancements.

By strategically investing in and continuously refining their mental health and well-being programs, organizations can move beyond compliance to create truly supportive, productive, and resilient workplaces where all employees can thrive.

Works cited

1. MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS AND PRODUCTIVITY: WHICH ARE THE RISK AND MITIGATING FACTORS OF ABSENTEEISM AND PRESENTEEISM? EVIDENCE FROM THE U.S. TECH SECTOR – SciELO Bolivia, accessed July 25, 2025, http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2518-44312024000300083
2. Mental health at work – World Health Organization (WHO), accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.who.int/teams/mental-health-and-substance-use/promotion-prevention/mental-health-in-the-workplace
3. Mental health at work: policy brief – World Health Organization (WHO), accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240057944
4. How Mental Health Shapes Absenteeism and Presenteeism in the Workplace – Learn to Live, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.learntolive.com/insights/how-mental-health-shapes-absenteeism-and-presenteeism-in-the-workplace
5. The Cost of Ignoring Mental Health in the Workplace – Humantold, accessed July 25, 2025, https://humantold.com/blog/the-cost-of-ignoring-mental-health-in-the-workplace/
6. 53 workplace mental health statistics you can’t ignore in 2025 – Spill, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.spill.chat/mental-health-statistics/workplace-mental-health-statistics
7. Financial Costs of Job Stress | Total Worker Health for Employers | CPH-NEW | Research | UMass Lowell, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.uml.edu/research/cph-new/worker/stress-at-work/financial-costs.aspx
8. The Flexible Work Effect on Well-being – Pipedrive, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.pipedrive.com/en/blog/flexible-work-effect-on-well-being
9. Legal obligations and rights – NSW Government, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.nsw.gov.au/employment/mental-health-at-work/legal-obligations-and-rights
10. The Intersection of Ethics and Labor in Mental Health – Number Analytics, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ethics-labor-mental-health
11. Employee Mental and Physical Well-Being: What Must Employers Do? | Éducaloi, accessed July 25, 2025, https://educaloi.qc.ca/en/capsules/employer-obligations-mental-health-and-physical-health-of-employees/
12. Fact Sheet #28O: Mental Health Conditions and the FMLA | U.S. Department of Labor, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/28o-mental-health
13. The Department of Labor Releases Guidance on Mental Health Protections Under the Family Medical Leave Act, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.srz.com/en/news_and_insights/alerts/mental-health-and-disability-discrimination
14. 8. Duty to accommodate – Ontario Human Rights Commission, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www3.ohrc.on.ca/en/policy-ableism-and-discrimination-based-disability/8-duty-accommodate
15. Workplace Well‑Being Resources | HHS.gov, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/workplace-well-being/resources/index.html
16. Discrimination and mental health – The Equality Act 2010, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.rethink.org/advice-and-information/rights-laws-and-criminal-justice/mental-health-laws/discrimination-and-mental-health-the-equality-act-2010/
17. Mental Health in The Workplace: Navigating Accommodations in Accordance with The Alberta Human Rights Act – Carbert Waite LLP, accessed July 25, 2025, https://carbertwaite.com/news-legal-commentary/mental-health-in-the-workplace-navigating-accommodations-in-accordance-with-the-alberta-human-rights-act/
18. Appendix A: Knowing the law – Australian Human Rights Commission, accessed July 25, 2025, https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/appendix-knowing-law
19. Mental Health in the Workplace I Rights and Responsibilities for Employers and Employees, accessed July 25, 2025, https://ecompliancetraining.com.au/2016/10/mental-health-in-the-workplace-i-rights-and-responsibilities-for-employers-and-employees/
20. Managing Employee Assistance Programs: A Comprehensive Toolkit – SHRM, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/tools/toolkits/managing-employee-assistance-programs-eaps
21. The Ethical Aspects of Mental Health Care for Employees – Workplace Ethics Advice, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.workplaceethicsadvice.com/2022/11/the-ethical-aspects-of-mental-health-care-for-employees.html
22. Support the Whole Person: Workplace Strategies for Better Mental Health, accessed July 25, 2025, https://mchapusa.com/support-the-whole-person-workplace-strategies-for-better-mental-health/
23. This Is What A Manager’s Role In Mental Health At Work Should Look Like, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mindsharepartners.org/blog/managers-role-in-employee-mental-health-and-wellbeing
24. Mental Health First Aid Training for Leaders | Goodwin University, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.goodwin.edu/enews/faculty-article-mental-health-first-aid-for-workplace-wellness/
25. 8 Effective Mental Health Initiatives for Healthcare Organizations – Healing Breaths, accessed July 25, 2025, https://healingbreaths.org/blog/effective-mental-health-initiatives-healthcare/
26. Workplace Mental Health & Well-Being – HHS.gov, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/workplace-well-being/index.html
27. What is an Employee Assistance Program (EAP)? – OPM.gov, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.opm.gov/frequently-asked-questions/work-life-faq/employee-assistance-program-eap/what-is-an-employee-assistance-program-eap/
28. The Benefits of Offering Flexibility in the Workplace: A Wellness Perspective – flimp.net, accessed July 25, 2025, https://flimp.net/the-benefits-of-offering-flexibility-in-the-workplace-a-wellness-perspective/
29. Mental Health Support on the Job: Reasonable Accommodations | Choose Work!, accessed July 25, 2025, https://choosework.ssa.gov/blog/2023-04-20-mental-health-support-on-the-job-reasonable-accommodations.html
30. www.dol.gov, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/odep/program-areas/mental-health/maximizing-productivity-accommodations-for-employees-with-psychiatric-disabilities
31. 10 Tips for Line Managers to Support Mental Health in the Workplace – Cigna Global, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.cignaglobal.com/the5percentpledge/10-tips-for-line-managers-to-support-mental-health-in-the-workplace
32. The Research-backed Value of Mental Health First Aid Training, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.mentalhealthfirstaid.org/2025/02/the-research-backed-value-of-mental-health-first-aid-training/
33. www.shrm.org, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/tools/toolkits/mental-health-friendly-workplace
34. Mental Health Metrics That Matter: How to Measure the Success of Your Wellness Initiatives | Disability & Claims Management – TeksMed Services Inc., accessed July 25, 2025, https://teksmed.com/mental-health-metrics-that-matter-how-to-measure-the-success-of-your-wellness-initiatives/
35. What’s the Best Way to Measure Employee Wellness? 6 Key Performance Indicators, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.bamboohr.com/blog/how-to-make-well-being-a-part-of-your-kpis